The inequity in the distribution of wealth in Australia
is yet another indicator of Australia's lack of egalitarianism.
In 1995, 20% of the Australian population owned 72.2% of Australia's
wealth with the top 50% owning 92.1% (Raskall, 1998: 287). Such
a significant skew in the distribution of wealth indicates that,
at least in terms of economics, there is an established class system
in Australia. McGregor (1988) argues that Australian society can
be categorised into three levels: the Upper, Middle and Working
classes. In addition, it has been shown that most Australians continue
to remain in the class into which they were born (McGregor, 1988:
156) despite arguments about the ease of social mobility in Australian
society (Fitzpatrick, 1994). The issue of class and its inherent
inequity, however, is further compounded by factors such as race
and gender within and across these class divisions. |
Because only a few people have
most of the money and power in Australia,
I conclude that it is not an equal
society. Society has an Upper, Middle and Lower class and I think
that most people when they are born
into one class, end up staying in
that class for their whole lives.
When all three classes are looked at
more closely, other things such
as the differences between the sexes and people's
racial backgrounds also add to the unequal nature of Australian
society. |