Aborigines and tuberculosis: why they are at risk 1
|
Abstract
Aborigines have higher rates of Mycobacterium
tuberculosis than the rest of the community. There are insufficient
contemporary data to assess how much risk tuberculosis poses to
the Aboriginal community.Tuberculosis is of particular concern because
of its interaction with human immuno-deficiency virus (HIV).We
aimed to ascertain the available data about tuberculosis in Australian
Aborigines: to determine morbidity and mortality of tuberculosis
in Australian Aborigines, to ascertain the extent of known risk
factors for tuberculosis in Australian Aborigines and to consider
the public health implications of our findings.Sparse
evidence suggests that Aborigines have higher rates of infection
and of clinical tuberculosis than non-Aboriginal Australians, along
with a high prevalence of known risk factors for tuberculosis. However,
there is a paucity of data about specific risk factors and tuberculosis
in Aborigines. In addition, Aborigines have a high prevalence of
risk factors for HIV infection.
The existence of concurrent risk factors for tuberculosis and HIV,
in a population that already has a high rate of infection with tuberculosis
is cause for grave concern. Tuberculosis control is centred on correct
and rapid diagnosis and appropriate treatment, as well as efficient
contact tracing. These are the most important strategies for control
of tuberculosis among Aborigines, and are especially important when
there is concurrence of other risk factors.Appropriate preventive
therapy for infected people should also be considered. |
What the research is about
(orientation to topic/
rationale for study)
What the research did
(research aims)
What it found
(results of research)
What the results
mean
(implications/
recommendations) |
| Tuberculosis was declared a global emergency
by the World Health Organization in 1993. It is essentially
a social disease which occurs mostly in people who live in
poverty and overcrowding. There are predisposing host risk
factors that increase the chance that the individual, once
infected, will progress to tuberculosis disease. The infected
individual carries the bacilli for variable lengths of time.
Should the person's immune system become less vigilant, susceptibility
to disease increases. Known risk factors for acquiring infection
and progression to disease include contact with an infectious
person, low body weight, alcohol abuse, diabetes mellitus,
renal failure and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
general topic - about tuberculosis |
| There is no firm evidence of tuberculosis among
Aborigines before the arrival of Europeans. High rates of
tuberculosis in Aborigines have been documented in the post-arrival
period with most reports coming from early this century. Early
reports suggested that Aborigines were a group of people with
no immunity to tuberculosis, who were not at great risk while
they maintained relatively isolated life styles but who, on
contact with outsiders, were vulnerable to tuberculosis. This
vulnerability was then compounded by overcrowding and poor
living conditions. 5 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
specific topic -
tuberculosis and Aborigines |
| Although comparatively little contemporary
data about disease prevalence are available, it is possible
to examine known risk factors for tuberculosis. This can be
considered an important task while there is the possibility
that one identifiable group in Australia is particularly vulnerable
to tuberculosis. This study aimed to throw light on this public
health concern by researching the available data on the relationship
between tuberculosis and Aborigines. We
aimed: to ascertain the available data; to determine
morbidity and mortality, to ascertain the extent of
known risk factors and to consider the public health
implications of our findings. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
research aims |
Method
We began by identifying available data on
tuberculosis in Australian Aborigines. We identified
morbidity and mortality data available from the Northern
Territory (NT), considered available data
about known risk factors for tuberculosis and the occurrence of
these risk factors in Aborigines. We examined
the usual risk factors for tuberculosis, with the exceptions
of silicosis, gastrectomy, jejunoileal bypass and miscellaneous
immunosuppressive illnesses for which we could not find information
specific to Aborigines. |
|
- the sentences in yellow in the following
paragraphs outline the steps taken to gain the data which would
provide answers to the research questions |
| We calculated
the age-standardised rate ratio for hospitalisation for tuberculosis
for Aborigines compared with non-Aborigines in the NT for
1979 to 1988. Hospital separation diagnosis is the diagnosis when
the patient leaves by discharge, death, transfer to another hospital
or discharge against medical advice. Numerator data were obtained
from the NT Department of Health and Community Services and denominator
data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Indirect age-standardisation
was done by calculating the number of cases that would have been
expected in Aborigines each year if Aborigines had the same rate
as the same-sex non-Aborigines averaged over the years 1979 to 1988,
and then taking a ratio of the observed to the expected rates.
5 |
|
|
| The indirectly
age-standardised rate ratio of death from tuberculosis for NT Aborigines
(1979 to 1991) was compared with the total Australian rate for 1991.
We examined 'tuberculosis' (ICD-9 codes 010-018) and 'late effects
of tuberculosis' (ICD-9 code 137) separately.' Indirect standardisation
was chosen because of the small number of deaths in the Aboriginal
population, and the Australian population was chosen as the reference
population because it was available (unlike the morbidity data)
and because the non-Aboriginal NT population had too few deaths
to use as a baseline. We grouped the years 1979 to 1991 into three-year
groups with the exception of the most recent years (1988 to 1991),
for which we grouped four years. |
|
|
| Ninety-five per
cent confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the
method described by Bailar and Ederer. 8 |
|
|
| Lastly, we looked
at data for HIV-AIDS in Aborigines and examined the potential for
problems with tuberculosis control based on what was known
about HIV and sexually transmissible diseases in Aborigines. We
used the hypothetical and rather simple model
proposed by Nunn et al. to estimate the effect HIV could have on
tuberculosis rates in Aborigines. 9 |
|
|
Results
Current data
| Current data were sparse. Thomson reported
evidence of decreasing rates of tuberculosis in Aborigines,
noting that in 1982 the rate was 26.3 per 100 000 for all
forms of tuberculosis. This was still about three times the
Australian rate. He quoted an annual rate of 135 per 100 000
in the NT in 1969 to 1973, declining to 30.2 in 1982. In Queensland,
the rate fell from an average rate of 151.9 per 100 000 in
1950 to 1972 to 26.2 per 100 000 in 1982.'° |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Incidence of tuberculosis
for Aborigines and non-Aborigines across Australia |
| Beilby et al. noted that in 1985 there were
36 cases of tuberculosis in Aborigines in South Australia,
a rate of 20.8 per 100 000, which was three times the rate
in the rest of South Australia without age- and sex-adjustment.
Subsequent age-standardisation for the years 1978 to 1988
gave an annual rate of 91.6 (Cl 56.2 to 127.0) for males and
38.6 (Cl 16.7 to 60.5) for females. Beilby et al. also undertook
Mantoux test surveys in four communities and found age-standardised
prevalence rates of infection of 6.2, 10.6, 21.0 and 33.5
per cent in the four communities. The authors noted that there
might be problems with both denominator and numerator identification
and that the rural-urban gradient was conflicting for infection
and disease reports. There did not appear to be any obvious
cause for this conflict, although one suggestion of the authors
was nutrition-related immunosuppression affecting Mantoux-positive
rates. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Incidence of tuberculosis
in SA |
| Krause and Britton reported that the rate of
tuberculosis in Aborigines in the NT was 114 per 100 000 in
1989, with seven deaths (17 per cent of Aboriginal notified
cases). They reported that the rate had fallen to 60 per 100
000 in 1991, and that there was over 90 per cent compliance
with treatment. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Incidence of tuberculosis
in NT
|
| Queensland health authorities reported that
the rate of tuberculosis (per 100 000) in indigenous Australians
was 25.8 in 1991, 11.1 in 1990, 20.2 in 1989, 12.1 in 1988,
20.4 in 1987, 24.5 in 1986, and 22.2 in 1985. This compares
with between 3.1 and 4.5 per 100 000 for all persons in Queensland
over the same period. 15
Krause and Britton reported that the rate of tuberculosis
in Aborigines in the NT was 114 per 100 000 in 1989, with
seven deaths (17 per cent of Aboriginal notified cases). They
reported that the rate had fallen to 60 per 100 000 in 1991,
and that there was over 90 per cent compliance with treatment.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Incidence of tuberculosis
in QLD |
| In the three years 1989 to 1991, there
were 155 cases of tuberculosis notified in the NT, of which 109
(70 per cent) were in Aborigines. The NT contributes about 3 to
8 per cent of tuberculosis in Australia, and represents about 1
per cent of the total population. Aborigines represent about 24
per cent of the NT population. |
|
|
| The rate ratios of hospital separation for
Aborigines in the NT compared with non Aborigines are shown
for tuberculosis in Figures 1 and 2. Both male and female
Aborigines had an estimated 3 to 29 times the rate of hospital
separation of non-Aboriginal Territorians. Because separations
reflect events rather than the actual number of individuals,
this could be a slight overestimation of cases, or, because
notifications may not be as accurate as hospital separation
data, it may be an underestimation. For this reason we (informally)
compared the total number of notifications from the annual
reports of the NT Department of Health with the total number
of hospital separations. No formal evaluation could be done
because the notification data were not available by unit records
and data for different periods were published. However, for
the years 1978 to 1988, excluding 1981, there were 325 notifications
and 329 hospital separations, indicating an overall correlation
between the two data sets. However, this correlation cannot
be checked by year, or by individual record. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
pointing out a problem in
data collection and the step taken to'get around' the problem |
Mortality
| Table 1 shows the rate ratio of death from
tuberculosis and the late effects of tuberculosis for Aboriginal
males and females in the NT compared with the Australian rates.
The estimates of the rate ratio of death are high, although
the small numbers are reflected in the wide confidence intervals.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
mortality data from NT |
Risk factors
| Table 2 summarises risk factors for tuberculosis
and what is known about the occurrence of the risk factors
in Aborigines. This table emphasises the prevalence of known
risk factors for tuberculosis in Aborigines. Of particular
concern is the higher risk of sexually transmissible diseases
with the associated implications for the risk of HIV in Aborigines.
The advent of HIV in Aborigines is likely to lead to morbidity
from tuberculosis. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
extent of known risk
factors for tuberculosis |
| Little data about the occurrence of tuberculosis
and risk factors are available. However, Patel et al. during
a study of central Australian Aborigines from 1984 to 1986
inclusive, found nine new cases of tuberculosis, of which
three were in diabetic people. Assuming that the other six
were not diabetic and using the estimated Aboriginal population
of the whole central Australian region, we calculated the
rate of tuberculosis for both the diabetic and the non-diabetic
group, estimated the crude rate ratio and calculated 95 per
cent confidence intervals. The crude rate ratio of tuberculosis
in diabetic Aborigines compared with non-diabetic Aborigines
is 15 (CI 3 to 44). The wide confidence intervals reflect
the small numbers of people with both diseases, even though
the rate ratio is high. These are the only data addressing
the issue of diabetes and tuberculosis in Aborigines that
we could find, but they highlight the importance of diabetes
in a population predisposed to tuberculosis. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
expands on the issue of
risk factors |
What could the future hold?
| Nunn et al. used a simple model to predict
what the effect of HIV could be on a tuberculosis-infected
population.Using the same argument and assuming that in the
NT there are approximately 40 000 Aborigines, of whom 60 per
cent are aged 15 or older, and assuming that in the adult
population 25 per cent are Mantoux positive, there are 6000
Mantoux-positive adult Aborigines in the NT. This rate of
Mantoux positivity seems reasonable considering the results
from Beilby et al. and the rate of tuberculosis in the NT.
Although HIV is thought to be uncommon
in Aborigines at the moment, the rapid changes in HIV prevalence
in Africa and Thailand, and the pre-existing risk factors
for HIV in Aborigines, indicate that the prevalence could
change rapidly. Assuming that 10 per cent of the adult population
contracted HIV, about 600 people would have concurrent tuberculosis
and HIV infection. Assuming a 10 per cent annual rate of progression
of tve tuberculosis. This would be, over the total population
of the NT, 60 in 40 000, or 150 per 100 000 in addition to
those people contracting tuberculosis who were not HlV-infected.
This remains a frightening prospect, and one that would cause
an enormous drain on health services, as well as the great
personal and social costs of such an increase. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
this paragraphs looks at
the public health implications of tuberculosis in an Aboriginal population
- the effect HIV could have on tuberculosis
rates in Aborigines |
Discussion
Aborigines already have high rates of infection
and disease from tuberculosis. They
suffer from social disadvantage which in turn exposes them to the
risks of poverty, underweight, homelessness, overcrowding and poor
nutrition. As well, they have a higher
than average prevalence of risk factors for tuberculosis, such as
diabetes mellitus, renal failure, alcohol abuse and smoking.
Although as yet largely untouched by HIV-AIDS, Aborigines are in
considerable danger of being affected by the AIDS epidemic given
their high rates of sexually transmissible diseases. If
HIV spreads to Aboriginal people, it follows that the tuberculosis-HlV
interface will become a major public health problem. We
have no knowledge about the heterogeneity of the population for
either tuberculosis or risk factors for tuberculosis; it is likely
that there are significant urban-rural differences at the very least.
In particular, we found little evidence of tuberculosis in Aborigines
in Western Australia, New South Wales or Victoria. |
|
- morbidity rates for Aborigines
- predisposition factors
- risk factors and Aborigines
- public health implications of the findings
- comments on
the limitations of the study and the data |
| Data about Aboriginal
health remain of poor quality. Many routinely collected data sets
fail to identify Aboriginality adequately. Census enumeration of
denominator data is also imperfect. There
are few data that provide more than a glimpse of the potential problem
for Aborigines and tuberculosis. There is no potential to be confident
about the size of the problem, nor to calculate risk versus benefits
of preventive therapy. It is not possible to compare Aborigines
with others with respect to the time taken for diagnosis of active
disease, the effectiveness of contact tracing and the extent to
which preventive therapy is used in skin-test-positive people. Completion
rates of treatment have improved substantially in the NT, from a
low of 34 per cent in the mid-eighties to 79 per cent in 1989, 88
per cent in 1990, 8:) per cent in 1991 and 100 per cent in 1992
(unpublished data, V. Krause, 1994). More
information is necessary to develop specific public health programs.
At the very least, it is essential that more information about tuberculin-skin-test
positivity be obtained to consider preventive therapy for people
infected with tuberculosis. |
|
- suggested directions for future
research |
| When the model
proposed by Nunn et al. is applied to the Aboriginal population
of the NT, it is clear that HIV, among
other things, has the potential to have an enormous impact on tuberculosis
rates in the future. The most important
issues in tuberculosis control in countries such as Australia are
the rapid and accurate diagnosis of disease, ensuring compliance
with effective medication and ensuring that appropriate contact
tracing measures are undertaken. These issues are more critical
in high-risk groups such as Aborigines, and are compounded by insufficient
information on compliance, outcomes of treatment, results of contact
tracing and multi-drug resistance. Tuberculosis is a curable and
potentially a preventable disease. A national tuberculosis program
must recognise this at-risk group of Aboriginal people and support
measures necessary to carry out effective control. With the prospect
of HlV, and what it could mean for this already disadvantaged group
of people, it is time to consider tuberculosis screening and, when
appropriate, preventive therapy for Aboriginal people. |
|
implications of research
recommendations of the study |
1 AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FUBLIC HEALTH 1995
Vol 19 No. 5 p.487-91
5Charles Kerr Department of Public Health and Community
Medicine, University of Sydney
8Aileen J. Plant National Centre for Epidemiology and Population
Health, Australian National University, Canberra
9Victoria L. Krause and John R. Condon Northern Territory
Department of Health, Darwin
© Copyright 2000
Comments and questions should be directed toUnilearning@uow.edu.au
|